Academic Writer
academic
writer: language: advanced language
Advanced Language
Adding points
Arguing tentatively
Asking questions
Citing
Comparing
Conceding a
point to an opposing argument (and then criticizing it)
Concluding
Criticizing
Distinguishing
Exemplifying
Explaining
Focussing
Limiting the scope
Qualifying
Referring back
Referring forward
Referring to evidence
Reformulating
Reviewing other arguments
Adding points
Again,...
Another possibility is that
At the same time it is true to say...
In any case
In other words
It should also be emphasized that
It should also be noted that
Mention should also be made of
Related to these arguments is the critique that
The corollary of this is that
The key point to note is that
The same can be said of
The same is true of
There were other factors which arguably counted for more.
This in turn means that...
At the same time it could be argued that
For one thing it could be argued that
Indeed, it might be argued that
It is tempting to pose another question.
It may well be asked how
It might be argued that
Nor is it entirely fanciful to suggest that
Of course it could be argued that
Still, there is no denying that
How can we explain x?
More controversial is the question as to whether
One way to answer this question is to try to see if
The crucial question may therefore be
The question remains
Was it such a bad thing to allow y? Not necessarily.
Was x unique in doing y? Certainly not.
What are the arguments on the other side?
What sort of picture do these considerations allow us to construct?
Why for example did x happen?
According to x
As has often been pointed out (e.g. cite authors)
As x has argued
As x has observed
As x has pointed out
As x has put it
As x has said
As x has shown
As x memorably put it
As x put it
Few share x's view that
In (x book) y author suggested that
In his article (cite article) he astutely argued that
In support of his argument x is able to quote
In x's words:
It is usually asserted that
Some authorities have implied that
This is not an isolated view.
X contended/ suggested that
X convincingly argues that
X has called it
X has concluded that
X has gone so far as to speak of
X has put it simply/bluntly
X once defined the objective of y as
X points to
X was quite right when he said that
In x by contrast
To say that x is the same as y would be to exaggerate. But the resemblances are very close
Conceding a point to an opposing argument (and then criticizing it)
Admittedly, simply doing x is a simple method of Yet it is not easy to see how else to assess y.
Although this argument has some merit, a number of qualifications need to be made.
In fairness to x yet
In one respect x's thesis that (give details) was quite wrong. However (mention plus points)
Indeed, it is plausible to argue that Yet, other evidence suggests
It is certainly hard to see a plausible alternative to Still if we look at
It is often assumed that However,
It is quite true that Yet in reality the most important factor was that
It is true that (give details of opposing view) However (affirm own argument)
More credible is the argument that However
Moreover it is at least arguable that Yet the extent to which x happened should not be exaggerated. What is more In reality
Nothing can detract from the central fact that However what is even more surprising is that
Some have argued that The reality is that
Some would say that this by itself is sufficient explanation. However
Such explanations are too simplistic. They tend to overlook the fact that It is also sometimes forgotten that
Superficially there is reason to think that However
There is no doubt that x is true. However it is too much to claim that Nor should it be assumed that
There is, of course, a natural temptation to conclude that But this was not the case. In fact Indeed it has even been suggested by one writer that
To be sure (x is true), but
All things considered then
Events show us that
Hence the paradox that
How can we account for ?
If one considers x it becomes clear that
In any case it seems clear that
In general, however...
In short,
In the final analysis this may be the best explanation of all.
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that
It seems clear that
It seems not implausible to link x with y
Judged by this criteria
Judged by this measure
More generally it seems hard to deny that
Nothing can detract from the central fact that
The extent of x is hard to quantify. Suffice it to say that
The most popular explanation remains that
Thus the circle from x to y seems complete.
To put it crudely
To put it simply
To sum up:
What is really remarkable is that
A more fundamental objection to this argument is that...
But the evidence seems too strong to suggest that
But there is a need for qualification
Disproportionate attention has been paid to
However it is not true to claim that
Similarly, the arguments against x ignore the fact that
Such evidence does not constitute adequate support for the theory that
The obverse of this argument is that
The possible flaw in this argument is
There is another possibility which has received too little attention, namely that...
There are however a number of difficulties with this critique.
This, so it is argued, was the reason why
Under the influence of x (author) I came to think of this view as mistaken.
Unfortunately for such theories, x was not common.
Yet there are limits to how far the idea of/concept of x can be taken.
Yet there is a need not to overstate the importance of
Another important distinction between x and y is that...
I would like to distinguish between x and y.
The essential difference is that...
The essential point on which I differ is that...
There is however an important difference between x and y.
We must here make a distinction.
A classic illustration often cited is
Another example of this may be given.
In the x case this was perhaps the most obvious.
More detailed studies show that
Only in one respect does the advantage seem to be with
Or let us take another example.
That x happened illustrates the point that
The evidence of x is even more obvious in the case of
The following passage may be taken as typical of this kind of evidence.
The origins of x can be traced back to
This was by no means unique.
This was typified by
To take yet another illustration...
Typical of x was
A general explanation remains difficult to find/elusive.
As a result
As for x, that would not have delivered y.
Despite the fact that x happened, it is not clear that
For all these reasons, what x has to say needs to be treated with caution.
How are we to explain x?
Moreover it is at least arguable that
Partly for this reason it was inevitable that
The main reason it happened was that
The reality was at best that
This achievement was primarily due to
This applies especially to
This in turn means that...
This problem has two aspects. As regards x... As regards y... For these two reasons...
What these cases show is that...
An important point sometimes overlooked is that
Essentially we need to look at
I do not mean to say x, but I do mean to say y.
It is important in this context to try to distinguish between x and y.
It is important to realise that...
More importantly
Of these points, the first needs to be discussed in more detail.
One of the most important points is that...
The essential point is that...
The essential thing about x is that it has y.
The facts of the matter therefore seem clear.
The importance of this lies in the fact that...
The importance of this lies in...
The real problem was not x but y.
The significance of this is that...
There are three key points in the above theory.
There is another possibility which has received too little attention. This is the thesis that
This is arguably the most important point:
This is the key to the problem.
This means that...
This takes us to the heart of the matter
This was one of the most important reasons why
Two questions especially interest me. The first of these is...
Two types of x need to be distinguished: The one is... The other kind is...
Yet the important point to note is that
But I will not consider this in the present discussion.
Without going into technical detail, it is possible to explain the broad principles of the theory.
But there is a need for qualification
In part, this might be explained by,...
To some extent it is true to say that...
As we have seen
As noted already
The view put forward above explains why...
We have already seen that However (make additional point)
We saw in the above definition that...
As will be argued in the next section
Assuming x is the case, it remains to ask...
I would now like to have a look at...
The previous section considered only x options. Now we are going to look at
There are various ways in which we might attempt to tackle this problem.
What are the arguments on the other side?
Without going into technical detail, it is possible to explain the broad principles of the theory.
According to the best available statistics
As table x shows
Figure x combines y and z
However these are of all the figures the least reliable.
However, these figures omit large numbers of people who
If one ignores x, the figure rises to
It will be seen at once that...
My own rough calculations summarized in table x confirm that
One estimate puts it as high as
Similar evidence can be found to support the view that
Table x summarizes the best available data. It will be seen that
The evidence is however ambiguous.
The figures show clearly that
These figures suggest that
We must of course treat these figures with caution.
When x is combined with y it seems that
In other words
A familiar objection to this argument is that
Apologists for this line of argument remind us that
For all these reasons, what x has to say needs to be treated with caution.
In defence of this view, a number of explanations have been offered.
It has also been persuasively argued that
So far as x is concerned...
Such views continue to be influential.
The most modern research has provided ample support for these arguments. In particular the claim that
The principal criticism has been that
There is some evidence to support x's thesis.
This argument can be pursued in more detail.
This line of argument has been further developed by
This point has been overlooked by many authors.
This problem has been dealt with by various authors...
Those who agree with this view include
Those who fall into this camp include
Typical of this approach is
What are the arguments on the other side?
Whereas earlier accounts emphasized x, it is now commonly argued that
X has been among the supporters of the view that
X repeatedly refers to Though it is now fashionable to criticize x, there is something to be said for
Academic Writer 2000